Written by Ravi Zacharias...
I’m sitting at the airport in Bahrain, about to catch a
flight
to Jakarta. The television screens are full of coverage for a man of
courage, conviction, and influence. Every now and then his picture with
his winsome smile is shown with the words under it: Nelson Mandela,
1918-2013.
Looking at the dates, I thought first of my mother. She was born just
two years before him but passed away nearly four decades before he did.
Yes, she had a short life span. She did not make a world impact but it
was because of her that I am a free man today. Her life and example were
for me, life-defining. Nelson Mandela, by contrast, changed history for
millions, if not for the world. A different role, a different call. So
it is that each one of us has a part to play, whether of great influence
or of small influence, but equally important.
Yet, as I look at his picture and consider his legacy, I mourn the
loss of not just a person, but an example for all politicians. While his
early years were more aggressive, his veteran years spoke of wisdom
gained through steps and missteps. Where are the leaders like him today?
Many of those who are eulogizing him have evidently not learned from
him. For one, he bore no hatred towards his oppressors. Even his period
of violence was short-lived and tempered. When he acquired freedom he
did not ask the oppressed to “go and vote for revenge.” After his time
in prison, he did not use the microphone to whip up hostility, division,
and frenzy or go on diatribes blaming his predecessors for doing
everything wrong. He did not use language that some in the media do,
some verbiage that is too vulgar to even repeat. He wanted to correct
society, not change, penalize, or pollute it. He won supporters to his
side with grace and dignity, not by bullying.
On one occasion I nearly met the man. It was my loss when it didn’t
come about. I was in Cape Town after having spoken to the framers of the
Peace Accord in Johannesburg when I received a call from his office
where his staff was trying its best to bring about a meeting between us.
But a strong bout of pneumonia, which he had contracted in prison, hit
him hard at that time and actually plagued him for the rest of his life.
Not meeting him was a loss I felt. I would have loved to have asked him
a few questions. One I would like to have asked is, “Deep inside, did
you ever feel like giving up?” I suspect I know the answer, but just to
be inspired, I would have liked to hear this one-time boxer turned
freedom-fighter in his soft voice express his determination to never
give up.
Nelson Mandela
The world has become a dangerous place. We need the Mandelas who know
when to lead, how to treat their opponents, and when to step down.
There is so much hatred in speeches today, such inflammatory rhetoric.
There is such an unyielding quest and clinging to power that we shudder
at the seduction so evident. What we
win
the masses with is what we win them to and we are subjecting a
generation to ignoble speech and lacerating rhetoric: How will this win
them to noble ends?
Two remarkable decisions among many show how Mandela bore no contempt
for his adversaries. Journalists have pointed this out. You’d think
they themselves would be instructed by it. When he received the Nobel
Prize
he chose to share it with his predecessor, President F.W. de Klerk.
This was an incredible move, truly walking the second mile. He never
wanted to play the hero. He knew the fight wasn’t about him. Also, at
his inauguration he invited the white jail warden to be present as his
personal guest. Mandela cautioned leaders that hatred beguiled the mind
and was an emotion leaders could not afford without reaping the
whirlwind. He would give no place to mockery that masqueraded as
statesmanship.
Our own leaders today would do well to learn from Nelson Mandela
rather than just giving grandiose speeches about him. What he began
still has a long way to go. I am a Christian and I admire the courage
and sacrifice of people such as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King,
Jr. and Nelson Mandela. Even if we are not all on the same page
theologically, we are on the same page for the protection of people who
are exploited or abused. It is a noble end. But the way our media and
political leaders frame the problem actually digs a hole deeper than the
one they are trying to fill. They poison the soul but expect healing.
When language comes easily for those who have the microphone, it can
become fatally fluent.
I spoke once at the Islamic University in Malaysia, one of the oldest
such universities of the world. I was asked to present a defense of
Christianity to a primarily Muslim audience. It was a nerve-wracking
hour, with sophisticated scholars in the audience. I would not
compromise my convictions. I needed to build a bridge without
surrendering ground. “How does one handle this?” I thought. I did my
best and the response was truly gratifying. Even the head of the Islamic
Studies department, the professor who was my host, said some of the
kindest words afterward in her office.
That evening I was taken out for dinner by a professor who
specifically asked if we could have an hour. His name was Professor
Living Lee, a geologist by specialty. He told me this story. Some years
ago the late vitriolic Muslim apologist Ahmed Deedat was presenting a
defense of Islam at the same university. Ironically, he was from South
Africa too. He had a bent to abusive language and inflammatory speech,
mocking opponents and inciting anger in his supporters towards those of a
different view. He provoked all the baser emotions for a supposedly
elevated cause. Deedat had delivered his talk at the university in his
usual hate-filled style, mocking Christianity and calling it nonsensical
and unlivable, among other charges. When Professor Lee, one of the few
Christians in the audience, questioned his charge, Deedat called him to
come to the front. Professor Lee walked forward. Deedat raised his hand
and with a full swing slapped him with a stinging hit to the face.
Professor Lee was nearly knocked to his feet. Deedat then barked, “Now
turn the other cheek!” It was obvious what he was trying to do. Suddenly
he paused and said, “We can do this quicker. Give me your shirt!”
Professor Lee unbuttoned and took off his shirt. “According to Jesus,
you should now offer your trousers, too, shouldn’t you?” Deedat said.
Professor Lee turned to the audience, apologized to his students and
faculty colleagues, took off his trousers, and quietly walked out of the
room in his underwear. The audience was in a dazed, stunned silence.
Outdone by a gentle but equally determined scholar, Deedat looked
utterly juvenile and like a man who had just been hoisted on his own
petard.
Dr. Lee went back to his office and put his face in his hands, his
spirit swirling with indescribable emotions. He wept though he knew he
had done the right thing in standing his ground. A few moments later
there was a knock on the door, then another, and another, and another.
When he opened the door, he saw students and colleagues lined up to
apologize to him for the pain and foolishness just displayed.
Deedat was freewheeling in rhetoric but a slave to pride. Quite
incredibly, he spent the last few years of his life smitten with a
stroke, unable to speak. The only weapon he had was lost to him. But in
reality, Deedat could never have attained greatness because he was
already too great in his own eyes.
Mandela had a cause greater than himself and is so remembered. He
spent the last few years of his life quite unwell. But his example
continued to speak for the freedom of all mankind. His spirit fought for
the dignity of man, and he never compromised the dignity of anyone in
fighting for it.
So when we read 1918-2013 we would do well to remember that though
the span of Mandela’s life is finished, the span of our human struggle
is not closed. But if our leaders do not know how to use speech
supported by character and instead use words only to provoke hostile
instincts, we will kill others with hate and the bracket around dignity
and freedom will be closed. Not everything that is fatal is immediate.
We are near the edge of that precipice. We have a choice. We all have a
platform.
I cannot end without mentioning one wound that Mandela probably
wished he could have healed: the break-up of his family. The price for
him was huge and the pain must have been deep. It was a price my mother
would not pay: We five children would have been the cost. It is a
sobering reminder for all of us. Our nation and our homes need healing.
The national struggle and the heart of a child will shape the future.
Politicians and parents play that role. No momentary gain had dare
violate eternal truths.
I pray for our leaders. I pray for our families. May God guide and help us.
